The
application is this: Surely God "aimed" at making every man immortal;
but in that case there could be no extinction. And surely God "aimed" at
making every man happy; but in that case there could be no endless
torment. On this basis, therefore, both extinction and endless torment
are impossible. What remains then but Restoration?
The second proposition is: That sin and suffering are abnormal
conditions in God's universe; and that therefore they cannot be
everlasting. If this theory is correct it would rule out
endless torment.
Then again: It is conceivable that temporary sin and suffering may be
necessary factors in God's righteous government.
This theory would explain why sin and suffering are permitted for a
time.
Again: Infinite holiness will do away with sin, and infinite love will
do away with suffering, as soon as perfect righteousness will permit.
Thus we believe that when sin and suffering have served their purpose,
they will be eliminated.
Further: There is no sin that infinite holiness, infinite power,
infinite love, and infinite wisdom cannot subdue, without impairing the
freedom of the offender.
This idea makes it credible that the worst of mankind will be reclaimed.
Finally: The fact that God is love will induce Him to place all His
creatures in conditions of happiness as soon as that can be done in
conformity with wisdom and righteousness.
Pages:
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229